- OSH in general
- OSH Management and organisation
- Prevention and control strategies
- Dangerous substances (chemical and biological)
- Biological agents
- Carcinogenic, mutagenic, reprotoxic (CMR) substances
- Chemical agents
- Dust and aerosols
- Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
- Indoor air quality
- Irritants and allergens
- Nanomaterials
- Occupational exposure limit values
- Packaging and labeling
- Process-generated contaminants
- Risk management for dangerous substances
- Vulnerable groups
- Physical agents
- Ergonomics
- Safety
- Psychosocial issues
- Health
- Sectors and occupations
- Groups at risk
INTRODUCTION AND KEY CONCEPTS
Managers play a key role in ensuring a safe and healthy workplace, including the management of psychosocial risks (PSRs). While employers retain overall responsibility, for ensuring a safe work environment, managers organise and oversee day-to-day work and are crucial for putting occupational safety and health (OSH) policies and prevention measures into practice. Their leadership, commitment, and awareness are essential for fostering a strong OSH culture and for complying with respective OSH legislation [1] [2] [3]. Managers are often tasked with creating appropriate working conditions and identifying psychosocial risks. Employers remain ultimately responsible and must ensure that managers have the necessary resources, competence and information to carry out these tasks; failure to do so may amount to organisational negligence under national law[4].
Psychological safety
Psychological safety refers to a shared belief that the workplace is safe for speaking up, admitting mistakes and showing vulnerability (e.g. allowing interpersonal risk-taking)[5]. It is based on a climate of openness where workers feel able to express themselves, question decisions and propose new ideas without fear of negative consequences. This can facilitate learning, innovation and creativity[6]. Psychological safety is often a prerequisite for workers to voice opinions or criticism, including towards managers, and to speak up when others are treated unfairly, without fear of repercussions[7]. Psychological safety has been associated with reduced risk for burnout and improved job satisfaction and well-being[8].
Managers have an important role in fostering psychological safety by promoting open communication and feedback without negative repercussions. For example, managers who foster open communication by actively sharing feedback and criticism they have received themselves, were not found to jeopardise their reputation as a competent leader[9]. Instead, such practices facilitated more actionable feedback, enhanced accountability, and supported ongoing practices that foster again psychological safety[10]. Eventually, creating psychological safety within organisations is a shared responsibility and also materialises in horizontal work relationships. Workers and colleagues play a central role in daily interactions and can foster a safety climate inter alia by communicating appropriately and treating other colleagues with respect[11].
Psychosocial safety climate
The employer has the power and ability to create the conditions necessary for psychosocial safety at work, thereby preserving workers’ physical and mental health[12]. Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) refers to the shared perception by workers within an organisation that its policies adequately protect workers’ mental health and safety, reflecting the employer’s values, priorities, practices and commitment for workers’ psychological safety and health, including whether mental health is regarded as equally important as productivity and profit[13]. PSC also reflects the quality of communication regarding psychological safety issues and the extent to which the employer demonstrates active involvement and commitment to PSR prevention across all organisational levels.
Psychological safety and PSC should be a strategic priority, a core part of organisational governance, to strengthen stability, resilience, and sustainability towards meeting future challenges[14]. Adequate PSR management at company level support PSC, by enabling job satisfaction, work engagement, better job performance and productivity[15], while preventing adverse effects of PSRs such as increased sick leave and turnover[16].
MANAGERS’ ROLE IN PSYCHOSOCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The role of managers in PSR management is essential to workers’ psychosocial safety and health. Considering their role, it is crucial that employers involve both managers and workers or their representatives in the design of a comprehensive framework of OSH and PSR management practices (The role of worker involvement is extensively covered in a specific OSHwiki article[17]). The involvement of managers strongly influences how successfully PSRs are addressed[18] [19], as they implement these practices and should understand the practical implications in their work organisation. When systematic OSH and PSR management practices are established, the likelihood that organisations act on psychosocial risk assessments increases[20].
Managers’ leadership and dedication to PSR prevention can enhance the effectiveness of information and communication about the organisational policies and guidelines and strengthen workers’ understanding and acceptance[21]. Managers’ involvement in OSH issues also positively influences workers’ compliance with safety rules and procedures[22]. Managers who create a safe work environment and encourage safe work practices positively affect their subordinate workers’ attitudes towards safety, generating a lower level of deliberate rule-breaking[23] [24] [25]. Conversely, destructive or abusive managers increase the risk for shortcuts and deliberate safety violations[26].
Managers are role models within an organisation. If they lead by example, workers are more likely to adopt similar behaviours in practice (exemplary leadership)[27] [28]. Effective PSR management requires managers to “walk the talk” by demonstrating genuine commitment to workers’ mental health, prioritising psychosocial risk prevention, maintaining open communication and being approachable when issues arise. Additionally, flat hierarchies and open‑door policies make it easier for workers to approach the employer/manager about PSRs and mental health concerns[29].
Stress, anxiety and depression are the second most common work‑related health problem in Europe[30], yet openly addressing these issues is still hindered by a fear of mental health stigma. Viewing PSRs as organisational rather than individual problems allows for them to be managed as systematically as other OSH risks[31]. An engaged manager who puts psychosocial risk management high on the agenda may also ensure that workers are more engaged and committed to those matters and as such also reduces the effects of stigma. The manager can thus create shared commitment for the prevention of PSRs and in encouraging workers to also positively contribute to the PSR management process[32].
Training for managers on psychosocial risk management
Promoting and protecting mental health at work requires recognising and responding appropriately to workers who show signs of emotional distress, as well as understanding how job-related stressors affect mental health. Managers must also be capable of identifying, assessing and managing psychosocial risks, such as excessive workload, lack of role clarity, low level of control over one’s job, insufficient support from colleagues or management, or a harmful organisational culture[33].
In light of the importance, complexity and sensitivity of PSR prevention, managers need access to adequate training to fulfil their role in PSR prevention. Leadership-oriented training can strengthen managers' competence in preventing PSRs and thereby support the development of a strong psychosocial safety climate.[34] [35] Managers should receive training that helps them recognise and respond to worker distress, build supportive communication skills, and identify and manage PSRs proactively10. Managers who have received adequate training have been found to comply more consistently with OSH rules and procedures and demonstrate a clearer understanding of the positive relationship between PSR interventions and productivity. To remain effective, training should be offered in varied formats and updated regularly [36].
Organisational support and resources for managers
Although the task to deal with PSRs is generally placed on managers, they are not always provided with the necessary resources. Managers need adequate organisational conditions to carry out this task effectively[37]. For instance, while managers in smaller enterprises benefit from greater scope for action and short decision paths[38], operational demands may lead them to prioritise core business activities over OSH responsibilities[39]. This indicates that managers engaging in PSR management face several organisational constraints including a lack of time [40][41],[42], financial resources and training[43],[44],[45]. Organisational conditions such as time, budget, established routines, manager discretion and role clarity, and the amount of support received by the manager impact PSR exposure. They directly influence how effectively a manager can shape the work environment, including managers’ abilities to provide workers with adequate resources and reduce their exposure to specific PSRs, directly impacting workers’ well-being[46].
Organisational support functions, such as human resources and occupational health services also play an important role in the management of PSR. Core human resources activities include sharing internal information on OSH and PSRs, keeping managers updated on regulations, procedures, routines, and planning and implementing training[47]. Occupational health services are another important but underused source of support in OSH and PSR management[48], mainly used for general health examinations rather than for supporting preventive OSH and PSR management activities. A recent Swedish study found that only half of the organisations studied had a successful collaboration with occupational health services in their preventive work[49].
LEADERSHIP STYLE AND WORKERS’ HEALTH AND WELLBEING
In recent years, leadership has been increasingly recognised as influencing worker well-being, and transformational leadership in particular has been positively associated with worker well-being[50],[51],[52]. A transformational leader is a manager of great motivational competence who is successful at stimulating change and creating a shared vision with subordinate workers to achieve common organisational goals. Similarly, managers who maintain good two-way relationships with workers (leader member exchange)[53] [54], and focus on developing relationships, cooperation and integration within the organisation (relationship-oriented leadership) have been found to positively influence worker well-being and job satisfaction[55].
Moreover, managers’ leadership style is likely to influence workers’ psychosocial well-being through their capacity to shape the working conditions. For instance, transformational leaders have been found to revitalise workers (e.g. through worker motivation and inspiration) while reducing some of the work demands[56]. Managers who are present in day-to-day operations and who meet the workers regularly may be better able to identify problems and mitigate the negative consequences for workers’ health. Conversely, in small organisations, managers’ wellbeing has perceptible consequences on their leadership, and their own ill-health may negatively affect workers well-being[57].
By contrast, destructive forms of manager leadership, such as abusive supervision, have been associated with reduced worker well-being. Workers exposed to destructive manager behaviour have shown to experience more stress, burnout, affective disorders, and overall health complaints. Besides undermining mental health, destructive leadership behaviours can also decrease workers’ productivity. [58]
MANAGERS’ EXPOSURE TO PSYCHOSOCIAL RISKS
Managers are themselves exposed to PSRs, including risks specific to their functions[59]. Results of surveys carried out among EU workers show that managers constitute the occupational category most likely to work long hours and long days, and to work in their free time to meet work demands, unveiling a poor work–life balance[60] [61]. In addition, managers often find themselves in the so-called “sandwich position”, facing contradictory demands and expectations from both the employer, other levels of management and the workers[62]. High psychological strain among managers can lead to psychosomatic complaints, which may in turn deteriorate the work environment [63]. Poor mental health among managers exposed to PSRs, such as increased stress-levels, can impact their ability to manage PSRs of other workers [64][65] .
Sustaining the mental health and well-being of managers is essential for the successful implementation of psychosocial risk management within organisations. Stress and burnout at higher hierarchical levels may cascade down to lower-level managers and workers, negatively affecting their mental health and increasing their risk of burnout [66]. Measures to improve managers’ health and well-being such as PSR management at all levels, combined where necessary with individual measures can support manager’s health and well-being. Such initiatives have been associated with improved work environments, more effective PSR management, and enhanced overall worker health [67].
CONCLUSION
Effective prevention and management of PSRs is promoted by both the employer’s strategic commitment and managers’ everyday leadership, which together can shape a safe and healthy work environment, psychological safety, and can support workers’ mental health and well-being. The employer shapes the organisation’s priorities and use of resources which influence the whole organisation, including the balance between job demands and job resources. In turn, managers play a key role in the practical prevention and management of psychosocial risks at work. They contribute to the implementation of PSR policies and procedures, the management of working conditions, and the creation of psychological safety and PSC.
A good PSC and psychological safety, not only support workers’ health and well-being but also benefit the organisation, increasing productivity, innovation and creativity. Through their behaviour and communication, managers can strengthen workers’ understanding of organisational expectations, policies and procedures, encourage worker engagement, promote an open climate where concerns are raised early, reduce job stress and induce a reduction of mental ill-health. This role requires adequate competence, resources and organisational support, which should be reflected in management development programmes.
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ORGANISATIONS
Considerations for managers
- Foster open communication to ensure psychological safety within the organisation and encourage workers to discuss mental health at work
- Lead by example and demonstrate through everyday actions that workers’ mental health and safety are priorities for the organisation
- Integrate psychosocial risk prevention into everyday management practices
- Work closely with support services, such as human resources and occupational health services
Considerations for employers
- Provide managers with sufficient time, resources, role clarity and organisational support to manage psychosocial risk effectively
- Ensure that managers receive training and information to identify, assess and manage PSRs in the workplace, and to communicate supportively with workers
- Make psychological safety and a positive psychosocial safety climate core priorities for the organisation in policy and practice.
- Safeguard managers’ own mental health and well-being so they can lead by example and effectively prevent and manage PSRs for other workers.
References
[1] Ankamah-Lomotey, S.A. (2025). The role of leadership in promoting occupational safety and health: Investigating the relationship between leadership and the health of workers. International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies, 2(8), 532–540. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijhrsss/07-2025-Vol02I8
[2] Bergman Bruhn, Å., Lindahl, C., Andersson, I.-M., & Rosén, G. (2023). Motivational factors for occupational safety and health improvements: A mixed-method study within the Swedish equine sector. Safety Science, 159, 106035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106035
[3] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2012) OSH management: legal duties and compliance. https://oshwiki.osha.europa.eu/en/themes/osh-management-legal-duties-and-compliance
[4] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2012) OSH management: legal duties and compliance. https://oshwiki.osha.europa.eu/en/themes/osh-management-legal-duties-and-compliance
[5] Dekker, S., & Edmondson, A. (2022). Psychological Safety. In S. Dekker, J. Rafferty, & A. Oates, Restorative Just Culture in Practice (1st edn, pp. 187–196). Productivity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003162582-11
[6] Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470690
[7] National Research Centre for the Working Environment (last updated 09/03/026). Styrk den psykologiske tryghed. https://nfa.dk/vaerktoejer/andre-vaerktoejer/god-tone/tema-3-kom-godt-i-gang-med-at-forebygge-negative-handlinger/vaerktoej-4-styrk-den-psykologiske-tryghed
[8] Manogna, B. S., Swamy, T., Gladys, S. S., & B Madhan. (2024). From Stress to Success: The Role of Safety Climate in It Employee Psychological Well-Being. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 05(04), 1095–1103. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2024.v05i04.01689
[9] Coutifaris, C. G. V., & Grant, A. M. (2022). Taking Your Team Behind the Curtain: The Effects of Leader Feedback-Sharing and Feedback-Seeking on Team Psychological Safety. Organization Science, 33(4), 1574–1598. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1498
[10] Yulita, Dollard, M. F., & Idris, M. A. (2017). Climate congruence: How espoused psychosocial safety climate and enacted managerial support affect emotional exhaustion and work engagement. Safety Science, 96, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.023
[11] National Research Centre for the Working Environment (last updated 09/03/026). Styrk den psykologiske tryghed. https://nfa.dk/vaerktoejer/andre-vaerktoejer/god-tone/tema-3-kom-godt-i-gang-med-at-forebygge-negative-handlinger/vaerktoej-4-styrk-den-psykologiske-tryghed
[12] Yulita, Dollard, M. F., & Idris, M. A. (2017). Climate congruence: How espoused psychosocial safety climate and enacted managerial support affect emotional exhaustion and work engagement. Safety Science, 96, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.023
[13] Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470690
[14] Dong, R. K., & Li, X. (2024). Psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate in workplace: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review towards a research agenda. Journal of safety research, 91, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.001
[15] Dong, R. K., Li, X., & Hernan, ‘Banjo’ Roxas. (2024). Psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate in workplace: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review towards a research agenda. Journal of Safety Research, 91, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.001
[16] Loh, M. Y., Dollard, M. F., & Friebel, A. (2024). Economic costs of poor PSC manifest in sickness absence and voluntary turnover. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 35(3), 635-648.
[17] See here more on the role of worker involvement in OSH: https://oshwiki.osha.europa.eu/en/themes/methods-and-effects-worker-participation
[18] Justesen, J. B., Eskerod, P., Christensen, J. R., & Sjøgaard, G. (2017). Implementing workplace health promotion – role of middle managers. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 10(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-04-2016-0030
[19] Molin, F., Hellman, T., & Svartengren, M. (2021). Implementing New Working Practices Through a Structured Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Management: A Qualitative Study From Swedish Municipalities. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 63(5), e259–e266. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002168
[20] Dahler-Larsen, P., Sundby, A., & Boodhoo, A. (2020). Can occupational health and safety management systems address psychosocial risk factors? An empirical study. Safety Science, 130, 104878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104878
[21] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2022). Managing psychosocial risks in European micro and small enterprises: Qualitative evidence from the third European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER 2019) : report. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2802/956032
[22] Dahl, Ø., & Olsen, E. (2013). Safety compliance in a highly regulated environment: A case study of workers’ knowledge of rules and procedures within the petroleum industry. Safety Science, 60, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.020
[23] Li et al (2020). Research on the Relationship Between Safety Leadership, Safety Attitude and Safety Citizenship Behavior of Railway Employees, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061864.
[24] Tomas, J. M., Melia, J. L., & Oliver, A. (1999). A cross-validation of a structural equation model of accidents: Organizational and psychological variables as predictors of work safety. Work & Stress, 13(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783799296183
[25] Dera et al (2025). The Psychosocial Safety Climate’s Influence on Safety Behavior and Employee Engagement: Does Safety Leadership Really Count? https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020179
[26] Liu et al (2012). The dark side of leadership. A three-level investigation of the antecedents of abusive supervision. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400
[27] Laloo, E., Coman, R., & Hanley, N. K. (2025). The association of leadership styles with psychosocial safety climate: The case of authentic leadership. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 18(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1541
[28] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2018). Healthy workers, thriving companies – A practical guide to wellbeing at work. EC_GUIDE_STRESS_MSD_WEB.pdf
[29] Laloo et al (2023). The impact of leadership on the psychosocial safety climate of organizations: A scoping review. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v13i2.43294
[30] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2023). Psychosocial risks and mental health at work.
https://osha.europa.eu/en/themes/psychosocial-risks-and-mental-health
[31] Laloo, E., Coman, R., & Hanley, N. K. (2025). The association of leadership styles with psychosocial safety climate: The case of authentic leadership. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 18(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1541
[32] St‐Hilaire, F., Gilbert, M., & Lefebvre, R. (2018). Managerial Practices to Reduce Psychosocial Risk Exposure: A Competency‐Based Approach. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 35(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1506
[33] World Health Organization (2022). Guidelines on mental health at work. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052
[34]Tripney Berglund, R., Kombeiz, O., & Dollard, M. (2024). Manager-driven intervention for improved psychosocial safety climate and psychosocial work environment. Safety Science, 176, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106552
[35] Dollard, M. F., & Bailey, T. (2021). Building psychosocial safety climate in turbulent times: The case of COVID-19. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), 951–964. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000939
[36] Dahl, Ø., Rundmo, T., & Olsen, E. (2022). The Impact of Business Leaders’ Formal Health and Safety Training on the Establishment of Robust Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems: Three Studies Based on Data from Labour Inspections. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031269
[37] Lundqvist, D., Reineholm, C., Ståhl, C., & Hellgren, M. (2024). Occupational health and safety management: Managers’ organizational conditions and effect on employee well-being. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 17(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-10-2023-0151
[38] Legg, S., Laird, I., Olsen, K., & Hasle, P. (2014). Creating healthy work in small enterprises—From understanding to action: Summary of current knowledge. Small Enterprise Research, 21(2), 139–147.
[39] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2022). Managing psychosocial risks in European micro and small enterprises: Qualitative evidence from the third European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER 2019) : report. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2802/956032
[40] Li et al (2020). Research on the Relationship Between Safety Leadership, Safety Attitude and Safety Citizenship Behavior of Railway Employees, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061864.
[41] Frick, K. (2014). The 50/50 Implementation of Sweden’S Mandatory Systematic Work Environment Management. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 12(2), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14774003.2014.11667802
[42] Larsson, R., Åkerlind, I., & Sandmark, H. (2016). Managing workplace health promotion in municipal organizations: The perspective of senior managers. Work, 53(3), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-152177
[43] Dellve, L., Skagert, K., & Eklöf, M. (2008). The impact of systematic occupational health and safety management for occupational disorders and long-term work attendance. Social Science & Medicine, 67(6), 965–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.030
[44] Masi, D., & Cagno, E. (2015). Barriers to OHS interventions in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Safety Science, 71, 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.020
[45] Sjöberg Forssberg, K., Vänje, A., & Parding, K. (2022). Bringing in gender perspectives on systematic occupational safety and health management. Safety Science, 152, 105776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105776
[46] Gilbert MH, Dextras-Gauthier J, St-Hilaire F, Lerouge L. Editorial: Understanding managers' mental health: the cornerstone for better organizational performance and workers' health. Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 2;15:1468825, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468825/full
[47] Reineholm, C., Lundqvist, D., & Ståhl, C. (2025). Collaboration, coordination, and cooperation in occupational health and safety management: Perspectives of managers, human resource practitioners, and occupational health and safety representatives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 20(1), 2563399. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2563399
[48] Halonen, J. I., Atkins, S., Hakulinen, H., Pesonen, S., & Uitti, J. (2017). Collaboration between employers and occupational health service providers: A systematic review of key characteristics. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 22.
[49] Akerstrom, M., Wahlström, J., Reineholm, C., & Jonsdottir, I. H. (2026). Employers’ utilization of and collaboration with occupational health services in preventive occupational health and safety management. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4269
[50] Arnold, K. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000062
[51] Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
[52] Skakon, J., Nielsen, K., Borg, V., & Guzman, J. (2010). Are leaders’ well-being, behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress, 24(2), 107–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.495262
[53] Montano, D., Reeske, A., Franke, F., and Hüffmeier, J. (2017) Leadership, followers' mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta-analysis from an occupational health perspective. J. Organiz. Behav., 38: 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2124
[54] Harms, P. D., Credé, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.006
[55] Lundqvist, D., Wallo, A., & Reineholm, C. (2023). Leadership and well-being of employees in the Nordic countries: A literature review. Work, 74(4), 1331–1352. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210063
[56] Teetzen, F., Bürkner, P.-C., Gregersen, S., & Vincent-Höper, S. (2022). The Mediating Effects of Work Characteristics on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employee Well-Being: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 3133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053133
[57] Ahmadi, E., Lundqvist, D., Bergström, G., & Macassa, G. (2023). Managers’ and employees’ experiences of how managers’ wellbeing impacts their leadership behaviours in Swedish small businesses. Work, 75(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-220159
[58] Liu et al (2012). The dark side of leadership:Athree-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of management Journal, 55(5), 1187-1212. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400
[59] Gilbert MH, Dextras-Gauthier J, St-Hilaire F, Lerouge L. Editorial: Understanding managers' mental health: the cornerstone for better organizational performance and workers' health. Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 2;15:1468825. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468825.
[60] Eurofound. (2021). Working conditions and sustainable work: An analysis using the job quality framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/all/working-conditions-and-sustainable-work-analysis-using-job-quality-framework
[61] Eurofound. (2017). Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview report (2017 update). Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2806/422172
[62] Gjerde, S., & Alvesson, M. (2020). Sandwiched: Exploring role and identity of middle managers in the genuine middle. Human Relations, 73(1), 124–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823243
[63] Skagert, K., Dellve, L., Eklöf, M., Pousette, A., & Ahlborg, G. (2008). Leaders’ strategies for dealing with own and their subordinates’ stress in public human service organisations. Applied Ergonomics, 39(6), 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.006
[64] Kaluza, A. J., Boer, D., Buengeler, C., & Van Dick, R. (2020). Leadership behaviour and leader self-reported well-being: A review, integration and meta-analytic examination. Work & Stress, 34(1), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1617369
[65] Fattori, A., Comotti, A., Bordini, L., Dollard, M. F., & Bonzini, M. (2022). Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) at middle management level in the healthcare sector: A contribution to the Italian validation of psychosocial safety climate-4. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1046286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1046286
[66] Parent-Lamarche, A., & Biron, C. (2022). When bosses are burned out: Psychosocial safety climate and its effect on managerial quality. International Journal of Stress Management, 29(3), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000252
[67] Sinelnikov, S., Bixler, E. A., & Kolosh, A. (2020). Effectiveness of safety training interventions for supervisors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 63(10), 878–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23163
Further reading
- Commitment and leadership as key occupational health and safety principles - OSHwiki | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
- Towards an occupational safety and health culture - OSHwiki | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
- Managing psychosocial risks: Drivers and barriers - OSHwiki | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
- Psychosocial risk factors at work and mental ill health - OSHwiki | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
- Interventions to prevent and manage psychosocial risks and work-related stress - OSHwiki | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
Select theme

